Offboarding employees securely and efficiently is a significant challenge for IT teams. In this article we’ll compare how BetterCloud, CloudM, and Zenphi handle offboarding in a Google Workspace environment — so you can decide which is the best fit for your organization.
Table of Contents
Why Offboarding Employees Is A Challenge
Offboarding employees securely and efficiently in a Google Workspace environment is a significant challenge for IT teams. It’s not just about disabling a user account — it involves transferring data, locking down access, archiving data — email/chat/Drive content, ensuring compliance (HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001), and maintaining audit-ready records. When you’re managing hundreds or thousands of offboardings/month, or high turnover (contractors, seasonal staff), the stakes and risks rise fast.
In this space there are several established solutions: BetterCloud, CloudM, and solutions like Zenphi. Each takes a different approach to offboarding and lifecycle automation and management in Google Workspace. In this article we’ll compare how BetterCloud, CloudM, and Zenphi handle Google Workspace offboarding — so you can decide which is the best fit for your organization.
The #1 IT Ops Automation Platform For Google Workspace
Zenphi is a go-to platform for teams utilizing Google Workspace environment for automating IT Operations and various Google admin tasks automation like user offboarding, data achieving, signature management and more. Book a call to learn how your peers achieve frictionless IT Ops automation with Zenphi.
What each platform offers
BetterCloud For Employees Off-boarding And Data Archiving
BetterCloud describes itself as a SaaS operations management platform that empowers IT to define, enforce and automate policies across SaaS applications — including Google Workspace.
In terms of offboarding, BetterCloud offers features like lifecycle workflows triggered from user state changes, group changes, or other SaaS events. For Google Workspace specifically, BetterCloud supports automated management of Google Groups, ownership of Drive files, user lifecycle tasks, and more. Its value proposition is broad — one tool to manage access, events, policy enforcement, and offboarding across many SaaS apps.
CloudM For Employees Off-boarding And Data Archiving
CloudM (via its module “Automate”) is more tightly focused on Google Workspace (and Microsoft 365) lifecycle workflows: onboarding, offboarding, license reclamation, archive migration. For Google Workspace offboarding, they highlight a workflow that can include 30 + “steps” such as user suspension, transfer of documents, archive, delete.
CloudM states: “CloudM Automate comes with over 35 customizable workflow steps that help you offboard staff in minutes. Its strength is a ready-made lifecycle tool, with many “out of the box” steps designed for Google Workspace user leavers.
Zenphi For Employees Off-boarding And Data Archiving
Zenphi is a no-code workflow automation platform built natively for teams on Google Workspace that enables event-driven automation across Directory, Groups, Audit Activity, Forms, Emails, API events, Drive, Gmail, Chat and more.
Instead of just lifecycle templates, Zenphi lets you design fully custom workflows — triggered by almost any event you define — and execute a broad action set: device lists, device sign-out, file-sharing notifications, Gmail signature changes, remote revoke, archive to custom destinations, etc.
In essence: Zenphi is off-boarding plus full digital-workplace automation flexibility.
Where each tool excels — and where they fall short
Zenphi isn’t a tool that comes with pre-built workflows. It’s a no-code AI platform designed to let you create automations that fit your processes.
You can start from a blank canvas or ask ZAIA, Zenphi’s AI automation assistant, to generate a workflow outline that you can refine visually.
Zenphi connects Calendar with Gmail, Sheets, Drive, and other business tools so your processes stay consistent, auditable, and scalable — all without writing code.
BetterCloud: Pros & Cons
Pros
- Broad SaaS operations focus: supports many apps beyond Google Workspace.
- Workflow builder with conditional logic and numerous triggers
- Designed for scalability across SaaS apps with policy enforcement.
Cons
- Because it covers many applications, the specialization for deep Google Workspace off-boarding + archiving may not cover every niche scenario (e.g., device management, Gmail chat archive)
- Pricing/licensing may be structured for broad SaaS management rather than purely high-volume off-boarding within Google Workspace.
- Some workflows may require additional configuration for advanced archive or device actions.
CloudM Automate: Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong specialization in Google Workspace (and M365) lifecycle workflows.
- Readily available “off-boarding steps” (30+ steps) that cover many user leave tasks (suspend user, transfer ownership, wipe devices, archive, etc.)
- Established tool within Google Workspace domain for these tasks.
Cons
- The cost model, often per-user/licence, can scale up sharply for thousands of leaves/month.
- Flexibility may be limited: if you want triggers from non-user state events (e.g., group membership change, custom API event) or deeply custom archive/destination workflows, you may hit limitations.
- Device management, file-sharing notifications, or cross-system workflows may require more custom work or external tools.
Zenphi: Pros & Cons
Pros
- Event-based triggers: workflows can start from Google Directory events, Google Group membership changes, Google Audit Activity, Forms submission, Email arrival, API calls from HRIS etc.
- Massive action palette (over 200 actions): device listing, remote sign-out, sharing notifications, Gmail signature change, file-ownership transfer, archives to custom destinations.
- Fully customizable workflows with conditional logic, integrations across IT, HR, Finance, and beyond.
- Cost model based on workflow operations rather than strictly per-user headcount — making high-volume off-boarding more predictable and economically viable.
- Native to Google Workspace/Cloud: less glue, more native.
Cons
- Because the platform is so flexible and capable, initial setup may require more design and thinking (though still no code).
- For very simple off-boarding scenarios (few leaves/month, standard steps) may be more capability than strictly required — though this may still be fine.
- Less pre-built templates than in lifecycle-only tools; more emphasis on building a workflow that would 100% match the requirements and automate each company's unique best practices rather than just clicking “run”.
Use-Case Spotlight: High Volume Off-boarding + Data Archiving
Imagine a global enterprise using Google Workspace that must off-board 2,000-5,000 employees per month (e.g., seasonal staff, contractors, high turnover retail/hospitality environment). They must archive Gmail and Google Chat data, transfer Drive ownership, revoke access across devices and apps, notify HR/Finance/Security, maintain audit logs, and do this at scale with predictability and cost control.
- With CloudM Automate: They may be able to configure a large off-boarding workflow using the available steps. But with 2,000-5,000 monthly off-boards, the per-user/licence cost could become very high. Flexibility around triggers (e.g., group membership, audit activity) or custom archive destinations may require additional work.
- With BetterCloud: Their breadth of SaaS application coverage helps if they also off-board across many tools beyond Google Workspace. But if the primary need is Google Workspace off-boarding + archiving, the broader scope may lead to higher cost or unnecessary complexity.
- With Zenphi: They can build a workflow triggered by a Google Directory event (user suspended), or a Group membership change (removed from “Active_Staff” group), or an API call from HRIS indicating termination, or a Forms submission. The workflow then suspends the user, lists all devices, remotely signs-out/blocks them, lists all files and sharing links, notifies all internal collaborators (“User X is being suspended – make a copy if you need”), transfers or archives Gmail/Drive/Chat data to the destination you define, updates the Gmail signature (“This mailbox is no longer monitored”), notifies HR/Finance/Security, and creates an audit/log record. Because pricing is based on workflow operations rather than per user, cost remains predictable and much lower — e.g., one organization moved from ~$1 M/year to ~$200K/year for the same scale. This makes Zenphi especially attractive when off-boarding volume is high and workflow complexity is non-trivial.
Decision Criteria: Which Tool Fits You Best?
Here are questions to ask when choosing between BetterCloud, CloudM Automate, and Zenphi for Google Workspace off‐boarding:
If the number is small (hundreds) you may not need full flexibility; if it’s thousands, you need scalability and cost control.
For example: Group membership removal, custom API/HRIS event, Form submission, email arrival? If yes, lean toward Zenphi.
If yes, Zenphi offers deeper flexibility.
If yes, Zenphi’s broader automation fits.
If you have high volume off-boarding, a per-user licence model may be expensive — operations-based pricing is more predictable.
If you want a tool mostly ready-to-go with minimal set-up and your needs are standard, CloudM or BetterCloud may suffice. If you want customization, trigger flexibility, and integration depth — Zenphi is stronger.
If you need device listing/wipe, file-sharing notifications, Gmail signature control, audit logs across every step — prioritize tools that offer that depth (Zenphi leads here).
If you need device listing/wipe, file-sharing notifications, Gmail signature control, audit logs across every step — prioritize tools that offer that depth (Zenphi leads here).
Larger Numbers, Higher Flexibility
There is no one-size-fits-all answer — BetterCloud, CloudM Automate and Zenphi each bring value to Google Workspace offboarding. The right choice depends on your volume, complexity, integration needs, and cost profile.
- If your needs are largely standard off-boarding for a moderate number of users and you prefer a lifecycle tool with many pre-built steps, CloudM Automate is a strong choice.
- If your environment spans many SaaS applications and you need broad policy enforcement across tools (not just off-boarding), BetterCloud may fit well.
- But if you face high-volume off-boarding, need custom event-triggers, archive Gmail/Chat/Drive data to custom destinations, manage devices and remote access, integrate across HR/Finance/IT, and want cost predictability, then Zenphi stands out as the most flexible, scalable solution for Google Workspace off-boarding.
Read More On Google Workspace User Lifecycle Management Automation
Best Tools For Off-Boarding & Data Archiving In 2026
Shared Drives Audits
Employee Offboarding: Revoke Access
Employee Offboarding Checklist
IT Operations Automation Best Practices
